OpenAI has made significant changes to its ChatGPT o3-mini model by introducing a new way of displaying its chain of thought (CoT). This update aims to enhance user understanding of the model’s reasoning processes. However, it has also sparked controversy and accusations of plagiarism against DeepSeek’s R1 model, which features a similar presentation style. Following these adjustments, OpenAI received mixed feedback from users regarding their preference for transparency in AI reasoning.
Table of Contents
OpenAI’s Approach to Chain of Thought
OpenAI’s updated ChatGPT o3-mini model attempts to clarify how the AI reasons and derives its responses. The company stated: “Users have told us that understanding how the model reasons through a response not only supports more informed decision-making but also helps build trust in its answers.” This focus on transparency aims to create a better user experience by making the thought process more accessible and friendly.
To ensure clarity in the reasoning process, OpenAI introduced an additional post-processing step that serves several functions:
- Content Safety: By reviewing the raw chain of thought, the model can eliminate unsafe content.
- Simplification: Complex ideas are simplified for easier understanding.
- Language Accessibility: Non-English users can receive the reasoning in their native language, enhancing accessibility.
This new method provides concise summaries of the model’s reasoning rather than presenting raw data, a shift aimed at improving user engagement with the technology.
User Reactions to the New Model
- Mayo Oshin: “We’d appreciate if you showed the full chain of thought, not just summarized version….thank you.”
- Conor: “It’s still a summary and not real CoT, which is disappointing.”
Additionally, some users speculated that OpenAI was emulating the innovations of DeepSeek, with comments indicating a perception of competition between the two companies. For instance:
- Hamza: “Finally DeepSeek changing the O-World for us.”
- Ignis Rex: “So OpenAI copied DeepSeek’s Chain of Thought feature?”
- Josip Tomo Licardo: “That moment when China is the one innovating, and the US is the copycat.”
These critiques highlight a tension in the AI community regarding innovation versus imitation, particularly in a landscape where many AI developments are closely watched.
The Positive Side of Changes
Nonetheless, there are users who regard the newly implemented reasoning system as a leap forward for ChatGPT o3-mini. Many have noted that the enhanced information about the model’s decision-making process has improved their interaction with the tool. For example, by selecting the Reasoning button before entering a prompt, users can see a more comprehensive view of how conclusions are reached.
Several enthusiastic responses from users illustrate this positive trend:
- Roman Pshichenko: “Hilariously, the chain of thought is more endearing and funny than the stiff response.”
- Jesus Vazquez: “That’s a nice improvement! I’d love to see some examples of how this update impacts its reasoning process.”
This feedback underscores a segment of the user base that appreciates the balance between enhanced clarity and effective communication presented by the AI model.
You may also like
- ChatGPT Search is now free for everyone, no OpenAI account required – is it time to ditch Google?
- ChatGPT on WhatsApp can now see, hear, and remember your conversations from elsewhere
- OpenAI’s Deep Research smashes records for the world’s hardest AI exam, with ChatGPT o3-mini and DeepSeek left in its wake
Leave a comment